Source Code Security Assessment
Code security review via Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST) tools and OWASP methodology and secure coding practices.
Senior AppSec staff with a background in full-stack Enterprise software development review your software repository source code against OWASP guidance with developer-ready fixes, CI recommendations, and a rapid diff/retest of your remediation efforts.
Overview
This engagement delivers a pragmatic, senior-led secure code review that goes beyond automated scanners. We combine targeted static analysis with manual reasoning about your authentication/authorization flows, input validation, data handling, crypto usage, file and process boundaries, and risky software development patterns.
We examine high-risk modules first (authentication, authorization, secrets handling), evaluate dependency and configuration hygiene, and analyze PR history to spot recurring anti-patterns. Findings map to OWASP ASVS and the OWASP Top Ten and include evidence, CWE references, and code-level remediation guidance.
You get an executive brief, a developer report with concrete fixes, and CI guardrails to prevent regressions, plus a quick follow-up review of your remediation diffs.
Ready to chat about LoC, CVEs/CWEs? Schedule a Code Review!
Tailored for Engineering/DevOps Teams
Whether you are preparing for enterprise reviews, major releases, or you want source code security audit evidence with actionable, code-level remediation guidance.
| You’ll receive the following |
|---|
| Risk-ranked findings, affected files/code sections |
| Code line-number specific remediation guidance and safer development patterns |
| Authentication/Authorization, session, input/output handling, SSRF, injection, deserialization reviews |
| Secrets & crypto checks (key management, randomness, hashing/crypto APIs and their implementations) |
| Dependency & configuration hygiene, optional SBOM and update plan |
| CI guardrails (pre-commit/CI rules, sample Semgrep policies) to prevent regressions |
| Executive summary + developer report; remediation workshop |
| Remediation diff review (verification of code bug fixes) |
How it works
- 1Repo access & scope
Define repos, modules, and priorities.
- 2Static & manual review
Tool-assisted SAST + manual analysis.
- 3Readout & triage
Evidence, severity, and fix strategy.
- 4Follow-up diff review
retest Verify fixes within 10 business days.
Schedule a meeting with our source code enthusiests!
Supported languages/tech stacks (non-exhaustive)
| Language | Frameworks |
|---|---|
| Java | Spring |
| C# | .NET |
| Python | Django, Flask, FastAPI |
| Node.js | Express, Nest |
| TypeScript | React, Next.js, Angular, Vue |
| Go | Gin, Echo, net/http |
| Ruby | Rails |
| PHP | Laravel, Symfony, CodeIgniter, Wordpress |
| IaC | serverless, containers and Dockerfiles GitHub Actions and GitLab CI Multi-cloud GCE/AWS/Azure |
Answers to common questions
Everything you need to know about our GRC & security assessments, from retests to safety and timelines.
Do you run programmatic scans?
Yes, tools assist (e.g., pattern and dataflow analyzers), but senior security practitioners lead and validate.
Will you need production data?
No, read-only source access is sufficient; we work in isolated environments.
Are findings aligned to security frameworks?
Yes, we map to OWASP and NIST CSF or COBIT controls and provide artifacts auditors expect.
Can you sign an NDA and work on-prem only?
Yes. NDA and on-prem or VDI-only access may be requested.